M7-Quantitative Decision Methods-S4 - Significance Testing

From knowledgebase
Revision as of 08:04, 25 August 2020 by Dirkjan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A Significance test aims to make a statement about a population parameter based on sample evidence. It is concerned with the acceptance of rejection of i...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Significance test aims to make a statement about a population parameter based on sample evidence. It is concerned with the acceptance of rejection of ideas using hypothesis.

In significance testing two types of error can be made:

  • A Type I error is the rejection of a null hypothesis when it was actually true. The probability of this error is the significance level of the test.
  • A Type II error is the acceptance (or failure to reject) a null hypothesis when it was actually false. The probability of this error cannot be determined.

A good link for further explanation is:

The possible results of a hypothesis test is shown in the table below:

Accept Reject
If is correct Correct decision Type I error
If is not correct Type II error Correct decision

Consider the following sample distribution for The two values of the test statistic A and B are both possible with B being less likely than A. The construction of this test with a 5% significance level would mean acceptance of the null hypothesis when A was obtained and the rejection if B was obtained. In reality both values could be attributed to a hypothesis which we accept in the case of B and reject for A. If the test follows a sample distribution we can never be certain about the correctness of our decision. It is possible with a fixed significance (Type I error) to construct a rejection region to minimize the type II error. Suppose an alternative hypothesis: where or In this case the type II error is as shaded below:

As you can see this type II error possibly has large impact. By testing against an alternative null hypothesis of the form or the size of the type II error can be reduced by carefully defining the rejection region. With

a critical value of z = -1.645 will define the rejection region in the left tail a critical value of z = +1.645 will define the rejection region in the right tail

The reduction in the error is depicted below: