Forbes is wrong about “Developernomics”

From knowledgebase
Revision as of 07:49, 25 August 2020 by Dirkjan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=URL= http://www.knowing.net/index.php/2011/12/09/forbes-is-wrong-about-developernomics/ =Description= Professional talent does vary, but there is not a shred of evidence tha...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

URL

http://www.knowing.net/index.php/2011/12/09/forbes-is-wrong-about-developernomics/

Description

Professional talent does vary, but there is not a shred of evidence that the best professional developers are an order of magnitude more productive than median developers at any timescale, much less on a meaningful timescale such as that of a product release cycle. There is abundant evidence that this is not the case: the most obvious being that there are no companies, at any scale, that demonstrate order-of-magnitude better-than-median productivity in delivering software products. There are companies that deliver updates at a higher cadence and of a higher quality than their competitors, but not 10x median. The competitive benefits of such productivity would be overwhelming in any industry where software was important (i.e., any industry); there is virtually no chance that such an astonishing achievement would go unremarked and unexamined.