Difference between revisions of "M7-S1 Session Notes"

From knowledgebase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "M7-S1 Session Notes Category:mbi")
Tag: Replaced
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
M7-S1 Session Notes
+
Discussed a case with company 'ABC' with a 'herbalife' or 'tupperware' like business model with 150000 agents and a turnover of 150000 agents. The EU would hold this company responsible to pay taxes over a portion of revenue generated through these agents. An earlier agreement a 58% consumption of own use was considered reasonable.
 +
 
 +
How would you tackle this case: Brainstorm in our team was to use the [[5 why an how technique|5 why an how technique]]:
 +
* 5 Why and How?
 +
** Who?
 +
*** Sampling
 +
**** Stratify for geography, revenue
 +
** What?
 +
** At what margin did you sell?
 +
*** Product consumption
 +
**** How frequently do you use the product?
 +
*** What is the shelf life time?
 +
*** Agent revenue
 +
**** How much is for own use?
 +
**** How much to famility and friends?
 +
**** How much are you able to sell to new customers?
 +
**** How much did you sell to a reseller?
 +
**** How much do you give away?
 +
**** Did you buy the products directly from ABC?
 +
**** How many product did you sell?
 +
**** How much products did you buy?
 +
**** How many product did you sell at reduced price?
 +
**** How much of your stock got stolen?
 +
**** How many customers do you have?
 +
**** How much of the
 +
** Where?
 +
** Why?
 +
** How?
 +
 
 +
Key points from the session:
 +
* How to get the data?
 +
* What is the average 'own use'?
 +
* What is the variance on the average?
 +
* What is the 95% [[Confidence interval|Confidence interval]]?
 +
* Tax authorities would argue that the average would be closer to the left tail of the distribution.
 
[[Category:mbi]]
 
[[Category:mbi]]

Latest revision as of 20:00, 27 August 2020

Discussed a case with company 'ABC' with a 'herbalife' or 'tupperware' like business model with 150000 agents and a turnover of 150000 agents. The EU would hold this company responsible to pay taxes over a portion of revenue generated through these agents. An earlier agreement a 58% consumption of own use was considered reasonable.

How would you tackle this case: Brainstorm in our team was to use the 5 why an how technique:

  • 5 Why and How?
    • Who?
      • Sampling
        • Stratify for geography, revenue
    • What?
    • At what margin did you sell?
      • Product consumption
        • How frequently do you use the product?
      • What is the shelf life time?
      • Agent revenue
        • How much is for own use?
        • How much to famility and friends?
        • How much are you able to sell to new customers?
        • How much did you sell to a reseller?
        • How much do you give away?
        • Did you buy the products directly from ABC?
        • How many product did you sell?
        • How much products did you buy?
        • How many product did you sell at reduced price?
        • How much of your stock got stolen?
        • How many customers do you have?
        • How much of the
    • Where?
    • Why?
    • How?

Key points from the session:

  • How to get the data?
  • What is the average 'own use'?
  • What is the variance on the average?
  • What is the 95% Confidence interval?
  • Tax authorities would argue that the average would be closer to the left tail of the distribution.