Difference between revisions of "The Democratic Leadership Style"

From knowledgebase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "The Democratic Leadership Style Category:goleman Category:Coleman Leadership Styles Category:M15 Category:Term")
Tag: Replaced
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The Democratic Leadership Style
+
="Let's decide together"=
 +
 
 +
The primary objective of the democratic style is '''''building commitment and consensus'''''. The democratic style is about gathering input. It is about building a vision and setting standards together. It is about sharing decisions and responsibility.
 +
 
 +
But what happens when team members are inexperienced or incompetent - when, in fact, you know best? In that ease, involving everyone in the decision-‘making process wouldn't be the wisest choice.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<html><img src = "/static/files//MBI/Module%2015/democratic.jpg" width="400"/></html>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=The democratic style in action=
 +
When using this style a manager:
 +
* invites team members to make decisions affecting their work
 +
* listens carefully to team members’ ideas
 +
* trusts that team members have the capability to develop the appropriate direction for themselves and the organization
 +
* reaches decisions by consensus
 +
* rewards team performance, rather than addressing it individuals with specific feedback.
 +
=The democratic style is most effective:=
 +
* when team members are competent and they have at least as much information and knowledge as the manager ~
 +
* when team members” work must be coordinated ctogethef
 +
* in instances when a manager is unclear about the best approach or direction and has competent team members who might have clearer ideas.
 +
=The democratic style is least effective:=
 +
* in crises - when there is no time for meetings or discussions
 +
* when team members are incompetent, lack crucial information, or need close supervision.
 +
=If you feel the situation needs you to be more democratic:=
 +
* '''Hold information sharing meetings.'''
 +
** Keep everyone involved and well informed about the organizational issues affecting them.
 +
** Each time you hear of a decision or change in your organization, ask yourself if your team should know. Will it provide clarity?
 +
** Will it inform their activities?
 +
** Hold frequent meetings to share information and ideas.
 +
** Always try to include everyone who is going to be directly affected.
 +
* '''Conduct participative meetings'''
 +
** This requires excellent meeting-management skills; agenda setting, time management, drawing in reticent people, holding back dominant individuals, listening, self-control, patience, etc.
 +
* '''Share decision-making'''
 +
** Ask your team to participate in making major decisions with you.
 +
** Give them whatever relevant information you have.
 +
** Then encourage them to decide collectively how they want to respond to those issues.
 +
* '''Seek consensus'''
 +
** Avoid taking an action or making a decision quickly.
 +
** Wait until everyone has been heard and supports the decision as the best course of action under the circumstances.
 +
* '''Give your team opportunities to show their capability'''
 +
** Give your team the job of identifying something that needs to be improved - and let them decide how to improve it. Then let the team's decision stand! You may want to start with something which you feel is not critical - where you will be comfortable to go with the team's decision - but which helps you assess your team’s true capabilities.
 +
=If you feel the situation needs you to be less democratic:=
 +
* '''ls this just a habit?'''
 +
** ls being democratic part of your culture?
 +
** Do team members expect to be involved in this way?
 +
** Does it make your organization effective?
 +
** What other managerial style or styles might maintain your team’s performance, while increasing your speed and efficiency?
 +
* '''Did it work in the past?'''
 +
** Have you always been able to rely on the capability, involvement and engagement of team members?
 +
** Have you always had plenty of time to make thorough decisions?
 +
** Can that continue into the future?
 +
* '''Will it work in the future?'''
 +
** Will the democratic style continue to be effective in the long term?
 +
** Are you putting enough energy into building team members capability so that you can continue this approach? Use your judgment to assess team members’ capability and engagement.
 +
** Set standards in the short term or provide coaching in the long term if you feel you need to.
 +
* '''How do you see yourself as a manager?'''
 +
** Do you see your role as 'first among equals'?
 +
** Do you believe that your team members’ capability and knowledge is greater than yours?
 +
** Which other approaches might be more expedient or efficient for your team?
 +
* '''Do team members all share the organization’s vision?'''
 +
** Do you feel that team members are drifting from the organization’s vision?
 +
** Be ready to remind team members who or what you are all there for!
 
[[Category:goleman]]
 
[[Category:goleman]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:28, 27 August 2020

"Let's decide together"

The primary objective of the democratic style is building commitment and consensus. The democratic style is about gathering input. It is about building a vision and setting standards together. It is about sharing decisions and responsibility.

But what happens when team members are inexperienced or incompetent - when, in fact, you know best? In that ease, involving everyone in the decision-‘making process wouldn't be the wisest choice.



The democratic style in action

When using this style a manager:

  • invites team members to make decisions affecting their work
  • listens carefully to team members’ ideas
  • trusts that team members have the capability to develop the appropriate direction for themselves and the organization
  • reaches decisions by consensus
  • rewards team performance, rather than addressing it individuals with specific feedback.

The democratic style is most effective:

  • when team members are competent and they have at least as much information and knowledge as the manager ~
  • when team members” work must be coordinated ctogethef
  • in instances when a manager is unclear about the best approach or direction and has competent team members who might have clearer ideas.

The democratic style is least effective:

  • in crises - when there is no time for meetings or discussions
  • when team members are incompetent, lack crucial information, or need close supervision.

If you feel the situation needs you to be more democratic:

  • Hold information sharing meetings.
    • Keep everyone involved and well informed about the organizational issues affecting them.
    • Each time you hear of a decision or change in your organization, ask yourself if your team should know. Will it provide clarity?
    • Will it inform their activities?
    • Hold frequent meetings to share information and ideas.
    • Always try to include everyone who is going to be directly affected.
  • Conduct participative meetings
    • This requires excellent meeting-management skills; agenda setting, time management, drawing in reticent people, holding back dominant individuals, listening, self-control, patience, etc.
  • Share decision-making
    • Ask your team to participate in making major decisions with you.
    • Give them whatever relevant information you have.
    • Then encourage them to decide collectively how they want to respond to those issues.
  • Seek consensus
    • Avoid taking an action or making a decision quickly.
    • Wait until everyone has been heard and supports the decision as the best course of action under the circumstances.
  • Give your team opportunities to show their capability
    • Give your team the job of identifying something that needs to be improved - and let them decide how to improve it. Then let the team's decision stand! You may want to start with something which you feel is not critical - where you will be comfortable to go with the team's decision - but which helps you assess your team’s true capabilities.

If you feel the situation needs you to be less democratic:

  • ls this just a habit?
    • ls being democratic part of your culture?
    • Do team members expect to be involved in this way?
    • Does it make your organization effective?
    • What other managerial style or styles might maintain your team’s performance, while increasing your speed and efficiency?
  • Did it work in the past?
    • Have you always been able to rely on the capability, involvement and engagement of team members?
    • Have you always had plenty of time to make thorough decisions?
    • Can that continue into the future?
  • Will it work in the future?
    • Will the democratic style continue to be effective in the long term?
    • Are you putting enough energy into building team members capability so that you can continue this approach? Use your judgment to assess team members’ capability and engagement.
    • Set standards in the short term or provide coaching in the long term if you feel you need to.
  • How do you see yourself as a manager?
    • Do you see your role as 'first among equals'?
    • Do you believe that your team members’ capability and knowledge is greater than yours?
    • Which other approaches might be more expedient or efficient for your team?
  • Do team members all share the organization’s vision?
    • Do you feel that team members are drifting from the organization’s vision?
    • Be ready to remind team members who or what you are all there for!