|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | =URL=
| + | Forbes is wrong about “Developernomics” |
| − | http://www.knowing.net/index.php/2011/12/09/forbes-is-wrong-about-developernomics/
| + | [[Category:management]] |
| − | | |
| − | =Description=
| |
| − | Professional talent does vary, but there is not a shred of evidence that the best professional developers are an order of magnitude more productive than median developers at any timescale, much less on a meaningful timescale such as that of a product release cycle. There is abundant evidence that this is not the case: the most obvious being that there are no companies, at any scale, that demonstrate order-of-magnitude better-than-median productivity in delivering software products. There are companies that deliver updates at a higher cadence and of a higher quality than their competitors, but not 10x median. The competitive benefits of such productivity would be overwhelming in any industry where software was important (i.e., any industry); there is virtually no chance that such an astonishing achievement would go unremarked and unexamined.
| |
| − | [[Category:software]] | |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:agile]] | | [[Category:agile]] |
Revision as of 19:07, 27 August 2020
Forbes is wrong about “Developernomics”
