Difference between revisions of "The Democratic Leadership Style"

From knowledgebase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "="Let's decide together"= The primary objective of the democratic style is '''''building commitment and consensus'''''. The democratic style is about gathering input. It is a...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 19:28, 27 August 2020

"Let's decide together"

The primary objective of the democratic style is building commitment and consensus. The democratic style is about gathering input. It is about building a vision and setting standards together. It is about sharing decisions and responsibility.

But what happens when team members are inexperienced or incompetent - when, in fact, you know best? In that ease, involving everyone in the decision-‘making process wouldn't be the wisest choice.



The democratic style in action

When using this style a manager:

  • invites team members to make decisions affecting their work
  • listens carefully to team members’ ideas
  • trusts that team members have the capability to develop the appropriate direction for themselves and the organization
  • reaches decisions by consensus
  • rewards team performance, rather than addressing it individuals with specific feedback.

The democratic style is most effective:

  • when team members are competent and they have at least as much information and knowledge as the manager ~
  • when team members” work must be coordinated ctogethef
  • in instances when a manager is unclear about the best approach or direction and has competent team members who might have clearer ideas.

The democratic style is least effective:

  • in crises - when there is no time for meetings or discussions
  • when team members are incompetent, lack crucial information, or need close supervision.

If you feel the situation needs you to be more democratic:

  • Hold information sharing meetings.
    • Keep everyone involved and well informed about the organizational issues affecting them.
    • Each time you hear of a decision or change in your organization, ask yourself if your team should know. Will it provide clarity?
    • Will it inform their activities?
    • Hold frequent meetings to share information and ideas.
    • Always try to include everyone who is going to be directly affected.
  • Conduct participative meetings
    • This requires excellent meeting-management skills; agenda setting, time management, drawing in reticent people, holding back dominant individuals, listening, self-control, patience, etc.
  • Share decision-making
    • Ask your team to participate in making major decisions with you.
    • Give them whatever relevant information you have.
    • Then encourage them to decide collectively how they want to respond to those issues.
  • Seek consensus
    • Avoid taking an action or making a decision quickly.
    • Wait until everyone has been heard and supports the decision as the best course of action under the circumstances.
  • Give your team opportunities to show their capability
    • Give your team the job of identifying something that needs to be improved - and let them decide how to improve it. Then let the team's decision stand! You may want to start with something which you feel is not critical - where you will be comfortable to go with the team's decision - but which helps you assess your team’s true capabilities.

If you feel the situation needs you to be less democratic:

  • ls this just a habit?
    • ls being democratic part of your culture?
    • Do team members expect to be involved in this way?
    • Does it make your organization effective?
    • What other managerial style or styles might maintain your team’s performance, while increasing your speed and efficiency?
  • Did it work in the past?
    • Have you always been able to rely on the capability, involvement and engagement of team members?
    • Have you always had plenty of time to make thorough decisions?
    • Can that continue into the future?
  • Will it work in the future?
    • Will the democratic style continue to be effective in the long term?
    • Are you putting enough energy into building team members capability so that you can continue this approach? Use your judgment to assess team members’ capability and engagement.
    • Set standards in the short term or provide coaching in the long term if you feel you need to.
  • How do you see yourself as a manager?
    • Do you see your role as 'first among equals'?
    • Do you believe that your team members’ capability and knowledge is greater than yours?
    • Which other approaches might be more expedient or efficient for your team?
  • Do team members all share the organization’s vision?
    • Do you feel that team members are drifting from the organization’s vision?
    • Be ready to remind team members who or what you are all there for!