Difference between revisions of "Forbes is wrong about “Developernomics”"

From knowledgebase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 20:35, 27 August 2020

URL

http://www.knowing.net/index.php/2011/12/09/forbes-is-wrong-about-developernomics/

Description

Professional talent does vary, but there is not a shred of evidence that the best professional developers are an order of magnitude more productive than median developers at any timescale, much less on a meaningful timescale such as that of a product release cycle. There is abundant evidence that this is not the case: the most obvious being that there are no companies, at any scale, that demonstrate order-of-magnitude better-than-median productivity in delivering software products. There are companies that deliver updates at a higher cadence and of a higher quality than their competitors, but not 10x median. The competitive benefits of such productivity would be overwhelming in any industry where software was important (i.e., any industry); there is virtually no chance that such an astonishing achievement would go unremarked and unexamined.