Difference between revisions of "Protect against imitation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Mechanisms to protect against imitation are: {| class="wikitable" !'''Imitator''' !'''Incumbent''' |- !Requirements for successful imitation !Barriers against successful imita...") |
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 20:02, 27 August 2020
Mechanisms to protect against imitation are:
| Imitator | Incumbent |
|---|---|
| Requirements for successful imitation | Barriers against successful imitation |
| 1) Must be able to identify competitive superiority | * Withhold information about profitability * Forgo short-term profits for long-term success |
| 2) Must be willing to imitate | * Deterrence (afschrikking, koude oorlog): signal promise to retaliation * Make commitments to make threat credible * Pre-emption: exploit all available investments opportunities/secure access to resources |
| 3) Must be able to understand sources of competitive advantage | * Tacit knowledge: rely on skills, processes or culture/resources that are implicit * Causal ambiguity: rely on complex multidimensional mix of sources |
| 4) Must be able to build / acquire necessary resources | * Base differentiation on resoureces that are rare/immobile/contracted * Exploit time tags |
Companies can find themselves in
- Sustaining circumstances
- Incremental innovations
- Higher margins by selling better products to the most demanding customers
- Disruptive circumstances
- In contrast to sustaining innovations, disruptive innovations are not focused on bringing better products to existing high end customers
- Instead, they usually tend to be significantly worse in the original performance dimensions
- But they excel in other benefits such as simplicity, convenience and most importantly, a lower price
Part of: M8-S2 - Reading - Strategies for E-Business - Chapter 6 - Sustaining Competitive Advantage