Difference between revisions of "Co-optition framework"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Replaced content with "Co-optition framework Category:mbi Category:Term") Tag: Replaced |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | While [[Porter's five forces|Porter's five forces]] framework focusses on the negative effects that market participants can have on a firms profitability, the co-optition framework enriches this perspective by highlighting the positive aspects such as: | |
| + | *Joint setting of technology and other standards | ||
| + | ** This is often a prerequisite for ensuring the growth of an industry. | ||
| + | * Joint developments | ||
| + | ** Can offer an opportunity for improving quality, increasing demand or streamlining procurement. | ||
| + | * Joint lobbying | ||
| + | ** Can help favorable legislation and helps growth and erecting [[Entry barriers|Entry barriers]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | See also: [[Co-opetition|Co-opetition]] | ||
[[Category:mbi]] | [[Category:mbi]] | ||
[[Category:Term]] | [[Category:Term]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:54, 27 August 2020
While Porter's five forces framework focusses on the negative effects that market participants can have on a firms profitability, the co-optition framework enriches this perspective by highlighting the positive aspects such as:
- Joint setting of technology and other standards
- This is often a prerequisite for ensuring the growth of an industry.
- Joint developments
- Can offer an opportunity for improving quality, increasing demand or streamlining procurement.
- Joint lobbying
- Can help favorable legislation and helps growth and erecting Entry barriers
See also: Co-opetition
