Difference between revisions of "The Democratic Leadership Style"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Replaced content with "The Democratic Leadership Style Category:goleman Category:Coleman Leadership Styles Category:M15 Category:Term") Tag: Replaced |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The | + | ="Let's decide together"= |
| + | |||
| + | The primary objective of the democratic style is '''''building commitment and consensus'''''. The democratic style is about gathering input. It is about building a vision and setting standards together. It is about sharing decisions and responsibility. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But what happens when team members are inexperienced or incompetent - when, in fact, you know best? In that ease, involving everyone in the decision-‘making process wouldn't be the wisest choice. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <html><img src = "/static/files//MBI/Module%2015/democratic.jpg" width="400"/></html> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =The democratic style in action= | ||
| + | When using this style a manager: | ||
| + | * invites team members to make decisions affecting their work | ||
| + | * listens carefully to team members’ ideas | ||
| + | * trusts that team members have the capability to develop the appropriate direction for themselves and the organization | ||
| + | * reaches decisions by consensus | ||
| + | * rewards team performance, rather than addressing it individuals with specific feedback. | ||
| + | =The democratic style is most effective:= | ||
| + | * when team members are competent and they have at least as much information and knowledge as the manager ~ | ||
| + | * when team members” work must be coordinated ctogethef | ||
| + | * in instances when a manager is unclear about the best approach or direction and has competent team members who might have clearer ideas. | ||
| + | =The democratic style is least effective:= | ||
| + | * in crises - when there is no time for meetings or discussions | ||
| + | * when team members are incompetent, lack crucial information, or need close supervision. | ||
| + | =If you feel the situation needs you to be more democratic:= | ||
| + | * '''Hold information sharing meetings.''' | ||
| + | ** Keep everyone involved and well informed about the organizational issues affecting them. | ||
| + | ** Each time you hear of a decision or change in your organization, ask yourself if your team should know. Will it provide clarity? | ||
| + | ** Will it inform their activities? | ||
| + | ** Hold frequent meetings to share information and ideas. | ||
| + | ** Always try to include everyone who is going to be directly affected. | ||
| + | * '''Conduct participative meetings''' | ||
| + | ** This requires excellent meeting-management skills; agenda setting, time management, drawing in reticent people, holding back dominant individuals, listening, self-control, patience, etc. | ||
| + | * '''Share decision-making''' | ||
| + | ** Ask your team to participate in making major decisions with you. | ||
| + | ** Give them whatever relevant information you have. | ||
| + | ** Then encourage them to decide collectively how they want to respond to those issues. | ||
| + | * '''Seek consensus''' | ||
| + | ** Avoid taking an action or making a decision quickly. | ||
| + | ** Wait until everyone has been heard and supports the decision as the best course of action under the circumstances. | ||
| + | * '''Give your team opportunities to show their capability''' | ||
| + | ** Give your team the job of identifying something that needs to be improved - and let them decide how to improve it. Then let the team's decision stand! You may want to start with something which you feel is not critical - where you will be comfortable to go with the team's decision - but which helps you assess your team’s true capabilities. | ||
| + | =If you feel the situation needs you to be less democratic:= | ||
| + | * '''ls this just a habit?''' | ||
| + | ** ls being democratic part of your culture? | ||
| + | ** Do team members expect to be involved in this way? | ||
| + | ** Does it make your organization effective? | ||
| + | ** What other managerial style or styles might maintain your team’s performance, while increasing your speed and efficiency? | ||
| + | * '''Did it work in the past?''' | ||
| + | ** Have you always been able to rely on the capability, involvement and engagement of team members? | ||
| + | ** Have you always had plenty of time to make thorough decisions? | ||
| + | ** Can that continue into the future? | ||
| + | * '''Will it work in the future?''' | ||
| + | ** Will the democratic style continue to be effective in the long term? | ||
| + | ** Are you putting enough energy into building team members capability so that you can continue this approach? Use your judgment to assess team members’ capability and engagement. | ||
| + | ** Set standards in the short term or provide coaching in the long term if you feel you need to. | ||
| + | * '''How do you see yourself as a manager?''' | ||
| + | ** Do you see your role as 'first among equals'? | ||
| + | ** Do you believe that your team members’ capability and knowledge is greater than yours? | ||
| + | ** Which other approaches might be more expedient or efficient for your team? | ||
| + | * '''Do team members all share the organization’s vision?''' | ||
| + | ** Do you feel that team members are drifting from the organization’s vision? | ||
| + | ** Be ready to remind team members who or what you are all there for! | ||
[[Category:goleman]] | [[Category:goleman]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:28, 27 August 2020
Contents
"Let's decide together"
The primary objective of the democratic style is building commitment and consensus. The democratic style is about gathering input. It is about building a vision and setting standards together. It is about sharing decisions and responsibility.
But what happens when team members are inexperienced or incompetent - when, in fact, you know best? In that ease, involving everyone in the decision-‘making process wouldn't be the wisest choice.
The democratic style in action
When using this style a manager:
- invites team members to make decisions affecting their work
- listens carefully to team members’ ideas
- trusts that team members have the capability to develop the appropriate direction for themselves and the organization
- reaches decisions by consensus
- rewards team performance, rather than addressing it individuals with specific feedback.
The democratic style is most effective:
- when team members are competent and they have at least as much information and knowledge as the manager ~
- when team members” work must be coordinated ctogethef
- in instances when a manager is unclear about the best approach or direction and has competent team members who might have clearer ideas.
The democratic style is least effective:
- in crises - when there is no time for meetings or discussions
- when team members are incompetent, lack crucial information, or need close supervision.
If you feel the situation needs you to be more democratic:
- Hold information sharing meetings.
- Keep everyone involved and well informed about the organizational issues affecting them.
- Each time you hear of a decision or change in your organization, ask yourself if your team should know. Will it provide clarity?
- Will it inform their activities?
- Hold frequent meetings to share information and ideas.
- Always try to include everyone who is going to be directly affected.
- Conduct participative meetings
- This requires excellent meeting-management skills; agenda setting, time management, drawing in reticent people, holding back dominant individuals, listening, self-control, patience, etc.
- Share decision-making
- Ask your team to participate in making major decisions with you.
- Give them whatever relevant information you have.
- Then encourage them to decide collectively how they want to respond to those issues.
- Seek consensus
- Avoid taking an action or making a decision quickly.
- Wait until everyone has been heard and supports the decision as the best course of action under the circumstances.
- Give your team opportunities to show their capability
- Give your team the job of identifying something that needs to be improved - and let them decide how to improve it. Then let the team's decision stand! You may want to start with something which you feel is not critical - where you will be comfortable to go with the team's decision - but which helps you assess your team’s true capabilities.
If you feel the situation needs you to be less democratic:
- ls this just a habit?
- ls being democratic part of your culture?
- Do team members expect to be involved in this way?
- Does it make your organization effective?
- What other managerial style or styles might maintain your team’s performance, while increasing your speed and efficiency?
- Did it work in the past?
- Have you always been able to rely on the capability, involvement and engagement of team members?
- Have you always had plenty of time to make thorough decisions?
- Can that continue into the future?
- Will it work in the future?
- Will the democratic style continue to be effective in the long term?
- Are you putting enough energy into building team members capability so that you can continue this approach? Use your judgment to assess team members’ capability and engagement.
- Set standards in the short term or provide coaching in the long term if you feel you need to.
- How do you see yourself as a manager?
- Do you see your role as 'first among equals'?
- Do you believe that your team members’ capability and knowledge is greater than yours?
- Which other approaches might be more expedient or efficient for your team?
- Do team members all share the organization’s vision?
- Do you feel that team members are drifting from the organization’s vision?
- Be ready to remind team members who or what you are all there for!